Posted on
July 01, 2009 by
Liz Rowell
Reading the SMH yesterday (I think) there was a piece on soft power in relation to the enormous cultural influence the US exerts (as demonstrated by global reaction to Michael Jackson’s death). I was especially intrigued by this quote……
What is soft power? The man who developed the concept, Joe Nye of Harvard University, explains: “Hard power is the ability to coerce others by using carrots or sticks as either bribes or threats. But soft power is the ability to get what we want by attracting others, by getting them to want the things we want.
“If I can get what I want because you want it too, it saves me a lot of carrots and sticks,” is how Nye put it to the BBC. It includes the power of culture, of values, of example, of desirability. The marketers of designer brands understand the value of the concept because it is the basis of their incomes.
I thought it neatly summed up what good advertising does and how marketers can save a lot of carrots. (We find the stick doesn’t work too well, except on things like private health insurance with threats about turning 31.) Which led me to revisit this Vanity Fair story about how the Obama White House handle the press. Long story short, and a very interesting one it is too, the White House Press secretary and his team set out to woo the journos from the print media, even though their perceived power is declining by the day. It’s the ultimate use of soft power…
Here are a few quotes that sum up the dynamic….
Instead, the (Obama administration) are wooing The New York Times as assiduously as Pierre Salinger did on behalf of John Kennedy in 1962. And, perhaps not surprisingly, The New York Times woos back—rewarding the president with a lavishness of coverage not seen since, well, J.F.K. in 1962. It’s an establishment lovefest.
It’s some perfect re-creation of a relationship between president and news media that has not been seen since the White House pressroom was a clubby place with reporters invited into the press secretary’s office for whiskey and cigars. It’s cozy. Rahm Emanuel and David Axelrod, who would have been, in previous administrations, the highest and most exclusive White House sources, have become almost casual quotes for the Times.
It is, curiously, a return to a time when the press was so much more dependent on the goodwill, and susceptible to the care and feeding, of the president. Indeed, The New York Times, and the rest of the established press, needs Barack Obama a lot more than he needs them.
But the article goes onto say that a key part of the White House’s media strategy is to pretend that they don’t have one. They don’t talk about it on the record or off. This in spite of having the biggest White House media relations team ever. Run by some pretty savvy individuals. And therein lies they way they leverage their “soft power”.
They have been handed a most remarkable historical moment—in which they get to remake the media in their own image. They have the power and they are the subject. These people in this White House are in greater control of the media than any administration before them.
The only thing is, they mustn’t let on that they know it.
Food for us marketers to chew on. Wooing the consumer….. Here’s a link to Joe Nye’s wikipedia entry if you’d like to know more about soft power.